Upper-Level Setbacks Delenda Est
Upper-level setbacks are terrible for both environmental sustainability and housing affordability. They have almost no benefits, and are making our city worse.
declaring war on vibes-based rules
From Brunswick to Heidelberg to South Melbourne to Richmond, buildings with bits missing permeate our streetscapes, with almost every new dense build taking on this architectural form.
But why?
It’s because of a planning control known as an ‘upper-level setback’, which is codified within planning schemes all across Melbourne.
This is not just a harmless piece of prescriptive design regulation: upper-level setbacks are terrible for both environmental sustainability and housing affordability.
They have almost no benefits, and are making our city worse.
In the context of dual climate and housing crises, it’s time we abolish unnecessary upper-level setbacks.
Related
Victorian budget continues delivery of Australia’s highest housing supply
The commitment to executing ongoing reform is pleasing. More should be done to ensure that home prices continue to fall.
Inquiry into Victoria Planning Provisions amendments VC257, VC267 and VC274
If there is a single takeaway from our submission it should be this: that these reforms are not radical. Rather, they represent common- and best-practice in planning from around the country and the world, and work predominantly to correct the devastating consequences of previous planning interventions.
The Activity Centre Program is redistributive
Through a focus on building in established areas, the Activity Centre Program is an opportunity to redistribute wealth and means to a greater number of Victorians.