Upper-Level Setbacks Delenda Est
Upper-level setbacks are terrible for both environmental sustainability and housing affordability. They have almost no benefits, and are making our city worse.
From Brunswick to Heidelberg to South Melbourne to Richmond, buildings with bits missing permeate our streetscapes, with almost every new dense build taking on this architectural form.
But why?
It's because of a planning control known as an ‘upper-level setback’, which is codified within planning schemes all across Melbourne.
This is not just a harmless piece of prescriptive design regulation: upper-level setbacks are terrible for both environmental sustainability and housing affordability.
They have almost no benefits, and are making our city worse.
In the context of dual climate and housing crises, it’s time we abolish unnecessary upper-level setbacks.
Inquiry into Victoria Planning Provisions amendments VC257, VC267 and VC274
If there is a single takeaway from our submission it should be this: that these reforms are not radical. Rather, they re...
The Activity Centre Program is redistributive
Through a focus on building in established areas, the Activity Centre Program is an opportunity to redistribute wealth a...
Inquiry into the supply of homes in regional Victoria
Planning restrictions are not just a problem for Greater Melbourne—they're a problem across our entire state, including ...